Looking at FALSE Christian beliefs in... Son of God

Sam Shamoun


The following is a continuation of our rebuttal series to the claims of Nisar Muhammad. We again would like to reiterate that Nisar’s arguments are some of the worst ever and as such are not worth refuting. Yet since he has repeatedly claimed that I have been unable to refute his arguments, I have chosen to publicly respond to him in order to silence this lie once and for all. We respond to Nisar’s article regarding the deity of Christ found here:

http://www.answerchristianity.fsnet.co.uk/Son.htm 

We begin, by the grace of our risen Lord and eternal Savior Jesus Christ. 

NISAR:

Jesus Is Not God

The Qur'an denies the deity of Christ: Surah Al-Maeda: 17: In blasphemy indeed are those that say that Allah is Christ the son of Mary. Say: "Who then hath the least power against Allah, if His will were to destroy Christ the son of Mary, his mother, and all every - one that is on the earth? For to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between. He createth what He pleaseth. For Allah hath power over all things." 72: They do blaspheme who say: "Allah is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship Allah, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with Allah,- Allah will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrong-doers be no one to help. 75: Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. His mother was a woman of truth. They had both to eat their (daily) food. See how Allah doth make His signs clear to them; yet see in what ways they are deluded away from the truth!

Islam, only accepts Jesus as a Prophet. He is joined with Abraham, Ishmael, Isaac, Jacob and Moses (Peace Be Upon Them All) as simply one of the Prophets (an-nabiyyin) between whom no distinction of any kind is made: Say ye: "We believe in Allah, and the revelation given to us, and to Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob, and the Tribes, and that given to Moses and Jesus, and that given to (all) prophets from their Lord: We make no difference between one and another of them: And we bow to Allah (in Islam)." Qur'an Surah Al-Baqara 136

He is no more than a servant. He was no more than a servant: We granted Our favour to him, and We made him an example to the Children of Israel. Qur'an Al-Zukhruf 59 And nothing more than a messenger. Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith, by the tongue of David and of Jesus the son of Mary: because they disobeyed and persisted in excesses. Qur'an Surah Al-Maeda 78

The Qur'an states that Jesus was the Messiah. He is called Al-Masihu Isa - "the Messiah Jesus" (Surah 4.157, 171). The title Al-Masih (the Messiah) sometimes appears by itself as in Surah 4:172 and on other occasions he is called Al-Masihubnu Maryam - "the Messiah, son of Mary" (Surah 9.31), but on each of the eleven occasions where it appears the title Al-Masih it is applied specifically to Jesus alone. When the Angel Gabriel first appeared to Mary he stated that the name of her son was to be Al-Masihu Isa (Surah 3.45).

The Qur'an declares Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger; many were the messengers that passed away before him. (Qur'an Surah Al-Maeda 78) 

RESPONSE:

Nisar appeals to the Quran in order to prove that Jesus is not God. Yet Nisar fails to give us any reason for accepting the Quran as a reliable source of information on the life and mission of Jesus. 

For instance, as Nisar himself noted, Jesus is called the Messiah eleven times in the Quran. Yet the Quran fails to explain the significance the title Messiah has in our understanding of Jesus. What exactly is a Messiah? What is the Messiah suppose to do? Why is Jesus called the Messiah? How do we know that he is the Messiah? The Quran fails to answer these questions and as such is an incomplete and unreliable record. 

For the answer to these pertinent questions we need to turn our attention to the word of God, the Holy Bible. It is here that we discover that prophets, priests and kings were generally consecrated to their respective positions by being anointed with God’s special oil prepared by the priests. This anointing symbolized the person’s divine commission, that the individual had been set apart and empowered by God to assume a specific role or function. This made them Messiahs, or anointed ones. (Cf. Exodus 30:22-31; 1 Samuel 10:1, 16:12-13; Psalm 105:15; Isaiah 45:1; Jeremiah 1:5; Lamentations 4:20)

At the same time, the Hebrew Bible singles out one person in particular who would be greater than all the others and who would reign on the throne of King David forever. This is the One whom the Jews eagerly awaited, and whom they called THE Messiah.  

Seeing that prophets, priests and kings were anointed figures, this indicates that this specific Messiah would also function as a prophet, priest and king. Several OT passages serve to clarify this point:  

Both the NT and Rabbinic tradition viewed this passage as a reference to the Messiah: 

“The King Messiah shall be exalted above Abraham, be high ABOVE MOSES.” Neve Shalom 

In fact MESSIAH IS SUCH A PROPHET as it is stated in the Midrash on the verse, ‘Behold my servant shall propser… Moses by the miracles he wrought drew but a single nation to the worship of God, but MESSIAH will draw ALL NATIONS to the worship of God.” Rabbi Levi ben Gershom 

Many Muslim scholars also believed that Moses prophesied the coming of Jesus in the Torah. One such scholar was Ibn Kathir. In his comments on S. 61:6 Ibn Kathir states: 

Muslim biographer Ibn Ishaq wrote in his biography Sirat Rasulullah: 

Interestingly, this tradition shows that copies of the Torah of Moses and the Gospel of Jesus were available during Muhammad’s time, being in the possession of the Jews and Christians. So much for Bible corruption! The following comments from Ar-Razi are taken from Mahmoud M Ayoub’s book, The Quran and Its Interpreters, Volume II, The House of Imran, State University of New York Press, Albany 1992. p. 150: 

Since Deuteronomy 18:15-19 is the only clear-cut prophecy about a prophetic figure to come after Moses, the Muslim claim that this prophecy refers to Muhammad cannot be sustained. This becomes even more evident when we take into consideration that this Prophet had to be like Moses in two respects, as the following citations indicate: 

This Prophet had to perform miracles similar to those performed by Moses, and had to know God face to face, i.e. have direct contact with God. Interestingly, the Quran also confirms that God spoke directly to Moses: 

The following citations demonstrate that Muhammad was quite unlike Moses in these areas: 

But (now), when the Truth has come to them from Ourselves, they say, "Why are not (Signs) sent to him, LIKE THOSE WHICH WERE SENT TO MOSES?" Do they not then reject (the Signs) which were formerly sent to Moses? They say: "Two kinds of sorcery, each assisting the other!" And they say: "For us, we reject all (such things)!" S. 28:48

Narrated Masruq:

I said to 'Aisha, "O Mother! Did Prophet Muhammad see his Lord?" Aisha said, "What you have said makes my hair stand on end! Know that if somebody tells you one of the following three things, he is a liar: Whoever tells you that Muhammad saw his Lord, is a liar." Then Aisha recited the Verse:

'No vision can grasp Him, but His grasp is over all vision. He is the Most Courteous Well-Acquainted with all things.' (6.103) 'It is not fitting for a human being that Allah should speak to him except by inspiration or from behind a veil.' (42.51) 'Aisha further said, "And whoever tells you that the Prophet KNOWS WHAT IS GOING TO HAPPEN TOMORROW, is a liar." She then recited:

'No soul can know what it will earn tomorrow.' (31.34) She added: "And whoever tell you that he concealed (some of Allah's orders), is a liar." Then she recited: 'O Apostle! Proclaim (the Message) which has been sent down to you from your Lord..' (5.67) 'Aisha added. "But the Prophet saw Gabriel in his true form twice." (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 6, Book 60, Number 378)  

Narrated Masruq:

'Aisha said, "If anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen his Lord, he is a liar, for Allah says: 'No vision can grasp Him.' (6.103) And if anyone tells you that MUHAMMAD HAS SEEN THE UNSEEN, he is a liar, for Allah says: "None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah." (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 93, Number 477)  

Returning to the OT portrait of the Messiah, we are told:

Rabbinic Judaism universally viewed the title “Branch” as a name of the King Messiah, the son of David, something which the OT affirms: 

Notice that in this passage God states that the Messiah’s name is Yahweh our Righteousness, implying that the Messiah is God. 

Interestingly, David’s sons were also called priests: 

Since the Messiah is to be David’s greater Son it is little wonder that the OT indicates that he too would perform priestly duties. Being a royal priest, the Messiah would reign and intercede forever:

And:

Finally: 

The OT also teaches that the Messiah would usher in everlasting righteousness and that through his death sin would be eradicated once and for all. The scriptures indicate that this was to take place before the destruction of the second temple:

These passages proclaim that this specific Messiah is the Mighty God, the Son of God, the King of all nations, sits on God’s right hand forever, the Eternal Priest of God, and God’s prophet/spokesperson to the people. That Jesus is the one spoken of in these passages becomes quite clear when reading the New Testament:

    “In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth, to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David; and the virgin's name was Mary. And he came to her and said, 'Hail, O favored one, the Lord is with you!' But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and considered in her mind what sort of greeting this might be. And the angel said to her, 'Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favor with God. And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus. He will be great, and will be called the Son of the Most High; and the Lord God will give to him the throne of his Father David, and He will reign over the house of Jacob forever; and of His kingdom there will be no end.” Luke 1:26-33

    “When they heard this, they raised their voices together in prayer to God. ‘Sovereign Lord,’ they said, ‘you made the heaven and the earth and the sea, and everything in them. You spoke by the Holy Spirit through the mouth of your servant, our father David: “Why do the nations rage and the peoples plot in vain? The kings of the earth take their stand and the rulers gather together against the Lord and against his Anointed One.” Indeed Herod and Pontius Pilate met together with the Gentiles and the people of Israel in this city to conspire against your holy servant Jesus, whom you anointed. They did what your power and will had decided beforehand should happen.” Acts 4:24-28

    “But now a righteousness from God, apart from law, has been made known, to which the Law and the Prophets testify. This righteousness from God comes through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe. There is no difference, for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God, and are justified freely by his grace through the redemption that came by Christ Jesus. God presented him as a sacrifice of atonement, through faith in his blood. He did this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had left the sins committed beforehand unpunished-he did it to demonstrate his justice at the present time, so as to be just and the one who justifies those who have faith in Jesus.” Romans 3:21-26

    “Every high priest is selected from among men and is appointed to represent them in matters related to God, to offer gifts and sacrifices for sins. He is able to deal gently with those who are ignorant and are going astray, since he himself is subject to weakness. This is why he has to offer sacrifices for his own sins, as well as for the sins of the people. No one takes this honor upon himself; he must be called by God, just as Aaron was. So Christ also did not take upon himself the glory of becoming a high priest. But God said to him, ‘You are my Son; today I have become your Father.’ And he says in another place, ‘You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek.’ During the days of Jesus' life on earth, he offered up prayers and petitions with loud cries and tears to the one who could save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverent submission. Although he was a son, he learned obedience from what he suffered and, once made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation for all who obey him and was designated by God to be high priest in the order of Melchizedek.” Hebrews 5:1-10

    “He of whom these things are said belonged to a different tribe, and no one from that tribe has ever served at the altar. For it is clear that our Lord descended from Judah, and in regard to that tribe Moses said nothing about priests. And what we have said is even more clear if another priest like Melchizedek appears, one who has become a priest not on the basis of a regulation as to his ancestry but on the basis of the power of an indestructible life. For it is declared: ‘You are a priest forever, in the order of Melchizedek’… And it was not without an oath! Others became priests without any oath, but he became a priest with an oath when God said to him: ‘The Lord has sworn and will not change his mind: “You are a priest forever.”’ Because of this oath, Jesus has become the guarantee of a better covenant. Now there have been many of those priests, since death prevented them from continuing in office; but because Jesus lives forever, he has a permanent priesthood. Therefore he is able to save completely those who come to God through him, because he always lives to intercede for them. Such a high priest meets our need-one who is holy, blameless, pure, set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens. Unlike the other high priests, he does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins once for all WHEN HE OFFERED HIMSELF. For the law appoints as high priests men who are weak; but the oath, which came after the law, appointed the Son, who has been made perfect forever.” Hebrews 7:13-17, 20-28

    “When Christ came as high priest of the good things that are already here, he went through the greater and more perfect tabernacle that is not man-made, that is to say, not a part of this creation. He did not enter by means of the blood of goats and calves; but he entered the Most Holy Place once for all BY HIS OWN BLOOD, having obtained eternal redemption… For Christ did not enter a man-made sanctuary that was only a copy of the true one; he entered heaven itself, now to appear for us in God's presence. Nor did he enter heaven to offer himself again and again, the way the high priest enters the Most Holy Place every year with blood that is not his own. Then Christ would have had to suffer many times since the creation of the world. But now he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to do away with sin BY THE SACRIFICE OF HIMSELF. Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment, SO CHRIST WAS SACRIFICED ONCE to take away the sins of many people; and he will appear a second time, not to bear sin, but to bring salvation to those who are waiting for him.” Hebrews 9:11-12, 24-28

    “And by that will, we have been made holy THROUGH THE SACRIFICE OF THE BODY OF JESUS CHRIST once for all. Day after day every priest stands and performs his religious duties; again and again he offers the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when this priest had offered for all time one sacrifice for sins, HE SAT AT THE RIGHT HAND OF GOD. Since that time he waits FOR HIS ENEMIES TO BE MADE HIS FOOTSTOOL, because by one sacrifice he has made perfect forever those who are being made holy… And where these have been forgiven, there is no longer any sacrifice for sin.” Hebrews 10:10-14, 18 

Seeing that the Quran teaches that Jesus is the Messiah and yet denies Christ’s divine nature and his role as priest and king strongly indicates that the author(s) of the Quran had no clue what the title Messiah implied. Had the author(s) known then he(they) may have hesitated in applying a title to Jesus which clearly demonstrates Christ’s uniqueness and preeminence over all creation.

NISAR:

Islamic Viewpoint Discussed

The Christian Gilchrist writes: "The ultimate cause for the relative paucity of conversions from Islam is the Qur'ans vehement rejection of the Christian belief that Jesus is the Son of God such as we find in the following verse: They say, "God hath begotten a son!" - Glory be to Him! He is Self-Sufficient! His are all things in the heavens and on earth! No warrant have ye for this! Say ye about God what ye know not? Surah 10.68

The Qur'an states that there is only one sin that God will not forgive, namely the associating of a partner with God. From this comes the belief that shirk, "associating", is the only unforgivable sin in Islam:

God forgiveth not that partners should be set up with Him; but He forgiveth anything else, to whom He pleaseth; to set up partners with God is to devise a sin most heinous indeed. Surah 4.48

"I believe that this verse is probably the greatest barrier in the way of conversion from Islam to Christianity. The very word "partner" comes from the same root letters as the word shirk, namely yushraku, and in Surah 10.66 we read likewise of shurakaa, "partners", who are worshipped other than God. As it is only two verses lower down that we find the rejection of a son to God in such vehement language (Surah 10.68 quoted above), it is to be presumed that the Christian belief in Jesus as the Son of God is one of the express acts of shirk that the Qur'an sets out to denounce as the greatest of all sins. In Surah 2.105 the Qur'an expressly speaks of mushrikeen (associaters) among the Ahlal-Kitaab (People of the Book), a common title for Jews and Christians, and in Surah 9.31 both groups, especially the Christians who take the Messiah to be ibnullaah (the Son of God) and their rabb (Lord), are said to be those above whom Allah is glorified from their yushriknun - what they "associate" with him The only conclusion that can be drawn is that the Qur'an teaches that among the acts of shirk, the unforgivable sin, is the belief that Jesus is the Son of God. "

Abdullah Araby, a Christian who wrote "A Christian Reads The Qur'an" states that Islam cannot accept the role of Jesus as the Son of God. This destroys the idea that the alleged eternal Son of God, one with the Father from all eternity who allegedly "became flesh and became a man".

Looking at the Qur'anic verse below and his statement*:

O People of the book! Commit no excess in your religion: nor say of Allah aught but truth, Christ Jesus the son of Mary was (no more than) an apostle of Allah, and His Word, which He bestowed on Mary, and a spirit proceeding from Him. So believe in Allah and His apostles. Say not 'Trinity': desist! It will be better for you. For Allah is One Allah. Glory be to Him: (Far exalted is He) above having a son." Surah 4:171

* "In this Qur'anic verse Jesus bears the highly-charged names the "Word of God" and "a Spirit proceeding from him". Both expressions refer to when Mary became pregnant through a miracle of God. But so that there will be no misunderstanding of the Qur'ans teaching on Jesus, the statement is preceded by an assurance that Jesus is merely the apostle of God, like Muhammad and many others. Besides this, the verse continues with an attack against the Trinity and an assertion that God does not have a son".

One wonders why Christians play gymnastics and word games with the references to Jesus as "his word" and "a spirit proceeding from him."

Hence there is no Logos but rather a servant of Allah and Prophet.  

RESPONSE:

One wonders why Nisar plays gymnastics and word games with the Quranic references to Jesus being God’s Word and a spirit proceeding from God. Since Nisar has evidently read the works of Gilchrist and Araby, then he is surely aware of the arguments set forth by these men in relation to the significance these titles have on the person of Christ. 

For instance, to say that Jesus is God’s Word implies that Jesus is God’s self-statement, his self-revelation. In other words, Jesus is God’s eternal and perfect statement that became flesh. Cf. John 1:1-14 

The common Muslim explanation that Jesus is called God’s Word solely because he was created by God’s command makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Since if this were the reason then we would expect the Quran to call Adam the Word of God since he is said to have been created by God's command also. (Cf. S. 3:59) Yet, neither Adam nor anyone else is ever called the Word of God. 

Second, that Jesus is a spirit proceeding from God implies that Christ preexisted as a Divine Spirit. This becomes more evident in light of the fact that the same statement, “a spirit proceeding from him”, is elsewhere used in reference to God’s omnipresent Spirit: 

    Thou wilt not find any people who believe in Allah and the Last Day, loving those who oppose Allah and His Messenger, even though they were their fathers or their sons, or their brothers, or their kindred. For such He has written Faith in their hearts, and strengthened them with a spirit from Himself. And He will admit them to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, to dwell therein (for ever). Allah will be well pleased with them, and they with Him. They are the Party of Allah. Truly it is the Party of Allah that will achieve Success. S. 58:22 

That this Spirit is able to strengthen a group of believers at the same time implies his omnipresence and omnipotence. This is perhaps why Abdullah Yusuf Ali can say that the Spirit is divine:  

    “… Cf. ii 87 and 253, where it is said that God strengthened the Prophet Jesus with the holy spirit. Here we learn that all good and righteous men are strengthened by God with the holy spirit. If anything, the phrase used here is stronger, `a spirit from Himself'. Whenever any one offers his heart in faith and purity to God, God accepts it, engraves that faith on the seeker's heart, and further fortifies him with the Divine Spirit, which we can no more define adequately than we can define in human language the nature of God." (Ali, The Meaning of the Holy Quran, p. 1518, f. 5365; bold and capital emphasis ours) 

Since Christ alone is said to be a spirit from God, this therefore implies that Christ is “the Divine Spirit, which we can no more define adequately than we can define in human language the nature of God.” This is perhaps the closest the Quran comes in affirming the deity of Christ.  

These titles demonstrate the inconsistent and contradictory picture that the Quran presents of Christ. In one breath, the Quran vehemently denies the divinity of Jesus, going so far as to accuse those who would believe that Jesus is God’s divine Son of blasphemy. Yet at the same time the Quran attributes titles and qualities to Jesus that exalt him far above humanity. This conclusively demonstrates that the Quran is not from God, since God wouldn’t give two conflicting and contradictory views of Jesus Christ. 

Nisar needs to face the music and deal with the fact that these Quranic titles pose major problems for the Muslim seeking to refute Christian beliefs. For instance, one such Muslim who evidently struggled with refuting the Christian assertions in regards to the divine implications of these titles was Ibn Kathir. In his commentary on S. 3:7, he notes: 

    <So far those in whose hearts there is a deviation> meaning, those who are misguided and deviate from truth to falsehood… 

    <they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof> meaning, they refer to the Mutashabih, because they are able to alter its meanings to conform with their false interpretation since the wordings of the Mutashabihat encompass such a wide area of meanings. As for the Muhkam Ayat, they cannot be altered because they are clear and, thus, constitute unequivocal proof against the misguided people. This is why Allah said… 

    <seeking Al-Fitnah> meaning, they seek to misguide their following by pretending to prove their innovation by relying on the Qur’an- the Mutashabih of it- but, this is proof against and not for them. For instance, Christians might claim that [‘Isa is divine because] the Qur’an states that he is Ruhullah [Sam- Spirit of God] and His Word, which He gave to Mary, all the while ignoring Allah’s statements…  

    <He [‘Isa] was not more than a servant. We granted Our favor to him.> [43:59], and… 

    <Verily, the likeness of ‘Isa before Allah is the likeness of Adam. He created him from dust, then (He) said to him: “Be!” and he was.> [3:59].

    There are other Ayat that clearly assert that ‘Isa is but one of Allah’s creatures and that he is the servant and Messenger of Allah, among other Messengers. (Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged), Volume 2, Parts 3, 4 & 5 (Surat Al-Baqarah, Verse 253, to Surat An-Nisa, Verse 147), First Edition: March 2000, pp. 112-113; bold emphasis ours) 

Ibn Kathir’s comments only highlight the major confusion and difficulty the Quranic picture of Jesus posed for Muslims in their encounters with Christians. Add to this list the following factors, and the Quranic confusion becomes more compounded: 

1. Jesus is the only human to be conceived of and born to a virgin. Cf. 3:45-47; 19:16-20; 66:12 

The common Muslim arguments used to explain away the significance of Jesus’ virgin birth are thoroughly inadequate. For instance, many Muslims claim that God caused Mary to conceive as a virgin in order to demonstrate his ability to create human beings in different ways. God created Adam without a father and a mother. God created Eve without a mother. God created Jesus without a father. And God creates everyone else from a father and a mother.

This explanation fails to explain why God chose Jesus to be born of a virgin, and not someone else like Moses or Muhammad. Furthermore, seeing that Adam was the first human being it was not possible for him to be born from either a father or a mother. Likewise, since Eve was the first woman she could not have been conceived from a mother. Yet this was not the case with Jesus since God could have caused him to be born from a father and a mother. This makes Jesus’ virginal conception much more astonishing and utterly unique. In light of these considerations, we can see why the Muslim explanation thoroughly fails to adequately deal with this fact. 

2. Jesus’ mother is the only woman mentioned by name in the entire Quran.

3. Jesus’ mother is the only woman to have an entire chapter named in her honor.

4. Jesus’ mother is preferred above all women. Cf. S. 3:42

5. Jesus and his mother are said to be a sign for mankind. Cf. 19:21; 21:91; 23:50

6. Jesus and his mother are protected from the touch of Satan. Cf. S. 3:36 

The Hadith expounds on the meaning of this passage: 

    Narrated Said bin Al-Musaiyab:

    Abu Huraira said, "I heard Allah's Apostle saying, 'There is none born among the off-spring of Adam, but Satan touches it. A child therefore, cries loudly at the time of birth because of the touch of Satan, except Mary and her child." Then Abu Huraira recited: "And I seek refuge with You for her and for her offspring from the outcast Satan" (3.36) (Sahih Al-Bukhari, Volume 4, Book 55, Number 641) 

Muslim historian al-Tabari cites Qatadah as saying:  

    "Jesus and his mother did not commit any of the sins which the rest of the children of Adam commit." (Ayoub, The Quran and Its Interpreters, Vol. II, p. 94; bold emphasis ours)  

7. Jesus alone is explicitly said to be honored or illustrious in the hereafter. Cf. 3:45

8. Jesus alone is said to be strengthened with the Holy Spirit. Cf. 2:87, 253; 5:110

9. Jesus alone is said to have created clay birds and breathed life into them, much like Allah breathed life into Adam. Cf. 3:49; 5:110 

Instead of evading these points, Nisar needs to address each of them one by one.

NISAR:

Samuel Zweier writes

"The Koran denies the Divinity and the eternal Sonship of Christ. He is a creature like Adam. God could destroy Jesus and his mother without loss to himself. Surah Maryam Ayat 35 & 36: "God could not take to himself any son.... When He decrees a matter He only says to it 'Be,' and it is." Surah Al-Imraan Ayat 51: "Verily, the likeness of Jesus with God is as the likeness of Adam. He created hint from the earth, then He said to him Be, and he was". Surah At-Tawba Ayat 30: "The Jews say Ezra is the son of God and the Christians say that the Messiah is the son God; that is what they say with their mouths imitating the sayings of those who misbelieved before. God fight them! How they lie". Surah Al-Maeda Ayat 19: "Infidels are they who say, Verily, God is the Messiah, the son of Mary. Say, who has any hold on God if He wished to destroy the Messiah, the son of Mary, and his mother and those who are on the earth together?"

God has no son...

"Say: 'If (Allah) Most Gracious had a son, I would be the first to worship." Al Zukhruf 43:81

It is completely unthinkable for God to have a son and therefore puts himself forward as the first worshipper of this son, who according to the Qur'an cannot exist.

Jesus denies he told anyone to worship him...

"And behold! Allah will say: 'O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, "Worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah"?' He will say: 'Glory to Thee! Never could I say what I had no right (to say)." Al Maeda Ayat 116.  

RESPONSE:

It is true that the Quran may say that Jesus is not God’s divine Son and that he is not to be worshiped, yet the Holy Bible affirms both these truths as we shall show. Nisar’s citations simply reinforce the contradictory and confusing picture the Quran paints of Jesus.  

NISAR:

Jesus (PBUH) is merely human...

"Christ, the son of Mary, was no more than a Messenger..." Surah Al Maeda Ayat 75 "And behold! Allah will say: 'O Jesus the son of Mary! Didst thou say unto men, "Worship me and my mother as gods in derogation of Allah"?' He will say: 'Glory to Thee! Never could I say what I had no right (to say)...'" Al Maeda Ayat 116 "Say: 'If (Allah) Most Gracious had a son, I would be the first to worship.'" Surah Al Zukhruf Ayat 81 "Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten; and there is none like unto Him." Surah Al-Ikhlas 112:2-4 Allah does not "beget" meaning that Allah has no children either in a spiritual or carnal sense. Thus, Allah can never be the Father. Nor does he allow himself to be "begotten", i.e. does not take on human nature such as God the Son did when he became man for our salvation. 

 

The term "begotten" was applied to the Son by the early Church Fathers. The Christian creed says: the only begotten son of God The Qur'an teaches that Jesus, who was certainly born of a virgin, was only human. The Qur'an also categorically denies that God revealed himself in Jesus and that Jesus was the Son of God. God has never begotten anyone
"Say: He is Allah, the One and Only; Allah, the Eternal, Absolute; He begetteth not, nor is He begotten, and there is none like unto Him." Surah Al-Ikhlas Ayats 1-4

RESPONSE:

Before responding to Nisar’s false claims, we would like to mention Nisar’s consistent plagiarizing of sources. For instance, Nisar’s comments regarding Allah not begetting is taken from my response to Akbarally Meherally which is found here:  

http://answering-islam.org/Responses/Meherally/mehB12_0.htm
 

This is not the only time that Nisar has stolen citations from other authors without giving credit where credit is due, or asking permission. It is one thing to take citations from authors and reword them in order to adopt them into one’s argument. It is quite another thing altogether to simply quote verbatim and give the misleading impression that the arguments are one’s own. 

Second, to be more precise, the early Church Fathers applied the term monogenes to the Son, a term also applied to Jesus in the New Testament. (Cf. John 1:14, 18; 3:16; 1 John 4:9) Some English translators have translated monogenes as “begotten”, while others translate it differently. J.N.D. Kelly for example, whom we will be quoting, translates monogenes as “unique Son.” 

Third, it may be true that certain verses of the Quran emphatically deny Jesus’ divine Sonship and preexistence, yet it is equally true that other Quranic passages affirm his divine preexistence as we have already demonstrated. This concludes this section. Part two to follow shortly, Lord Jesus willing.

  1. Home Back Home
  2. Articles by Sam Shamoun Found on Answering Islam main site

E-mail me Quennel Gale at queball20@yahoo.com