Looking at FALSE Christian beliefs in... Jesus Christ

Sam Shamoun


The following article is a response to the claims set forth by Nisar Muhammad which can be found here:

http://www.answerchristianity.fsnet.co.uk/JC.htm 

We will omit material that has already been addressed in our previous rebuttals. All biblical quotations are from the RSV, unless noted otherwise. 

NISAR:

The God of Jesus was a Jew. He was circumcised as a Jew. He lived as a Jew and prayed as a Jew. He performed the Jewish Rites. He was addressed as a Rabbi by the learned. Jesus the pious Jew celebrated Passover, he taught in the temples, he wore tsitsit and the fringe or tassels attached to the four corners of a robe. He showed regard for the temple by paying the half shekel tax.  

RESPONSE:

Since historic Christianity has always taught that Jesus was a Jew, we really do not see the relevance of Nisar’s statements in relation to Jesus being God? Does Nisar assume that Jesus cannot be God in nature solely because he was also a Jewish man? Then this is his dilemma since the Holy Bible clearly teaches both truths, namely that Jesus is both fully God and fully human. More on this below. 

NISAR: 

"The question concerns Jesus a Galilean Jew of the first third of the first century, for whom 'God' would have a meaning specified by his background and the theological language of the time. By way of simplification (and perhaps oversimplification) let me say that I think by a Jew of that period `God' would have been thought of as One dwelling in the heavens - among many attributes. (Brown, Responses to 101 Questions on the Bible [Paulist Press; Mahwah, N.J. 1990)  

RESPONSE:

Let us complete the quote that Nisar “borrowed” from one of my articles: 

And,  

It is clear that Raymond Brown’s statement in context wasn’t denying the Deity of Christ, but was simply explaining why Christ never said he was God, or why others never asked him if he were God. Brown’s answer demonstrates that Christ, the Apostles and the NT wholeheartedly teach that Christ is God. 

NISAR: 

The God of Jesus was God (The Father). The God = The Father  

By God "The Father is understood the creator of the world and the sole reigning deity of the Old Testament as well as the first person of the Holy Trinity."  

In the New Testament the Jews claim that God is Our Father and Jesus said, it is the father, of whom you say... he is Our God.  

RESPONSE:

Again, let us quote Jesus’ words in context: 

In this passage, Jesus makes the following astonishing claims: 

1. God is Christ’s Father, whereas he is not the Father of these unbelieving Jews.

2. God glorifies Christ just as Christ glorifies God.

3. Christ claims that his word has the sovereign power to prevent believers from ever dying (spiritually).

4. Christ existed before Abraham came into being, and came forth from God out of heaven. Compare: 

5. Interestingly, whereas Jesus calls Abraham the father of these Jews, Jesus never calls Abraham his own father. Rather, Jesus shows that he is greater than Abraham since the latter rejoiced to see Jesus’ day. 

NISAR:

Jews have worshipped God as a one undivided being; one single person; the father. The Jews believe that the father alone is God. The Jews believe only in one God; The God=The Father.  

RESPONSE:

Typical of anti-Trinitarians, Nisar commits the fallacy of hasty generalization and equivocation, as well as non sequitur. He wrongly assumes that since God is often, but not always, used of the Father this automatically means that the Father alone is God. In so doing Nisar erroneously assumes that God and Father are interchangeable terms. Nisar then begs the question by asserting that since God is only one individual, namely the Father, Jesus therefore cannot be God.  

Whereas the term Father does refer to a specific person distinct from the Son, as well as the Holy Spirit, this is not the case with the term "God." Although often used of the Father, the term God is also used of the Son, as the following citations demonstrate: 

Fulfillment: 

And: 

Fulfillment: 

Finally: 

According to the NT, the Lord God that is to descend upon the Mount of Olives is none other than the Lord Jesus Christ!: 

The preceding OT passages and their subsequent fulfillment in Jesus clearly demonstrate that the term God does not always refer to the Father. These examples also demonstrate that the OT prophets were aware that the one true God of Israel is multipersonal, something which we will expound upon shortly. Other passages where God is used in reference to the Son include: 

Second, since Trinitarians believe that God is one undivided Being, it is therefore apparent that Nisar is attacking a straw man here. Nisar erroneously assumes that an undivided Being cannot exist or subsist in three distinct, yet inseparable Persons. Yet Nisar provides no arguments proving why this cannot be true. 

Third, it might be true that some (many?) Jews have worshiped God as one single Person, namely the Father, yet it is not true that EVERY Jew believed this way. Nor is it true that the Holy Bible supports the erroneous view that the Father ALONE is God.  

For instance, it was monotheistic Jews who believed in the absolute Deity of the Son and the Holy Spirit who wrote the NT. This clearly demonstrates that there were many Jews who worshiped God as a Triune Being. 

Furthermore, as was already mentioned, the OT is replete with passages demonstrating that the one true God exists as a multipersonal Being. For the sake of brevity, we will only highlight a few examples: 

Here, Yahweh on earth destroys Sodom and Gomor’rah with fire from Yahweh in heaven. This is a clear reference to two distinct Persons as God. That one of these Persons is on earth can be seen from this passage: 

This passage has caused major problems for anti-Trinitarians such as Muslims, Jehovah’s Witnesses and even unbelieving Jews. The reason being is that this passage clearly teaches that the true God Yahweh has appeared on earth to his servants in the form of a man, something that the preceding groups vehemently deny. In fact, this passage goes so far as to say that Yahweh actually ate food that was offered to him by Abraham! 

Furthermore, that Genesis 19:24 unmistakably identifies two distinct Persons as Yahweh God can be seen from the following passage: 

Here, Yahweh states that Sodom and Gomor’rah were overthrown by another entity who is God also. 

“Ho! ho! Flee from the land of the north, says the LORD; for I have spread you abroad as the four winds of the heavens, says the LORD. Ho! Escape to Zion, you who dwell with the daughter of Babylon. For thus said the LORD of hosts, after his glory SENT ME to the nations who plundered you, for he who touches you touches the apple of his eye: ‘Behold, I will shake my hand over them, and they shall become plunder for those who served them. Then you will know that the LORD of hosts HAS SENT ME. Sing and rejoice, O daughter of Zion; for lo, I come and I will dwell in the midst of you, says the LORD. And many nations shall join themselves to the LORD in that day, and shall be my people; and I will dwell in the midst of you, and you shall know that the LORD of hosts HAS SENT ME TO YOU. And the LORD will inherit Judah as his portion in the holy land, and will again choose Jerusalem.’ Be silent, all flesh, before the LORD; for he has roused himself from his holy dwelling.” Zechariah 2:7-13  

According to this passage, Yahweh God is being sent by Yahweh God to dwell in the midst of his people! 

Yahweh says that he will deliver Judah by Yahweh their God. This refers to God’s miraculous deliverance of Judah from the hands of the Assyrian King Sennacherib. The OT records the fulfillment of God’s promise: 

God sent the Angel of Yahweh to strike down 185,000 Assyrian soldiers. This means that the God whom Yahweh used to deliver the house of Judah was none other than the Angel of Yahweh! 

We have already written extensively on the Angel, demonstrating from the Old Testament that this particular Angel isn’t a creature, but is actually Yahweh God himself functioning in the role of a messenger. Yet at the same time the OT shows that this Angel is sent by another who is called Yahweh God, indicating that the one true God is multipersonal. We also presented evidence that this Angel is none other than OT appearances of the preincarnate Christ! For more information, we recommend the following article: http://answering-islam.org/Responses/Menj/tam1.htm 

Here, the Creator Yahweh God claims that Yahweh God has sent him and the Spirit, a clear affirmation of God’s Triunity!  

The Exodus of Israel is attributed to Yahweh God the Father, the Angel of His Presence (i.e. the Angel of Yahweh) and the Holy Spirit. Notice again that the Angel is given divine attributes and functions, being referred to as God’s personal Presence and the Agent of redemption. This is another clear-cut OT proof of God’s Triunity. 

NISAR: 

In the Bible the term God is used primarily as a name for the father. Hence every time that Jesus Christ in the New Testament refers to "the father", "Our Father", "Your Father", "My father", "heavenly father" this is a reference to the Lord God or God Almighty.  

RESPONSE:

Nisar is correct that the Father is the Lord God and God Almighty. Yet the NT clearly teaches that Jesus and the Holy Spirit are also the one true Lord God and God Almighty. 

NISAR: 

Jesus himself was a pious Jew who called God "Father".

Father in the New Testament is called 'the God of....Jesus Christ'. The Father was the one to whom Jesus prayed. According to Christian theology, Jesus as the God-Man both prayed to the Father both privately in seclusion and in secret and in public. Father is the one Jesus called "My God."

For Jesus God the Father was his "The God" (the deity). As a Jew he (Jesus) said we the Jews worship the father; hence The God (divine being) = The Father!

The God of Jesus was not a Trinitarian nor a triune deity. The God of the Jews and Jesus only had a single one person in the GODHEAD; namely the Father. Hence The God of Jesus has become one of three.

RESPONSE:

Here, Nisar attacks a strawman since no Trinitarian has ever claimed that Jesus’ God is the Trinity. Nisar commits the fallacy of false dilemma since implicit in his statement is the erroneous assumption that “God” either refers to the Trinity or to the Father, but it cannot refer to both. Yet, in Trinitarian usage the term God refers to different things in different contexts. For instance, when a Trinitarian refers to the God of Christ, he or she means the Father. When a Trinitarian speaks of God being manifested in the flesh, God here refers to the Lord Jesus Christ becoming man for our salvation. The Trinitarian is not claiming that the Trinity became man, or that the Father or the Holy Spirit became flesh. 

Similar, the Holy Bible also uses the term God in different senses as we have already shown above and as Nisar himself notes: 

Second, Jesus became a member of creation by partaking of human nature:  

By becoming man, Jesus’ relationship with the Father took on a new dimension since the Father now became Jesus’ God. Since Jesus retains his human nature, the Father will forever remain his God: 

Compare: 

Other verses include: 

This concludes this part. Part two follow shortly, Lord Jesus willing.

  1. Home Back Home
  2. Articles by Sam Shamoun Found on Answering Islam main site

E-mail me Quennel Gale at queball20@yahoo.com